BLOG

MY PERSONAL JOURNEY

Is the Lottery a Tax?

In the United States, the lottery contributes billions of dollars to the economy annually. People play for fun, but some see the lottery as a chance to change their lives. The problem is that the odds of winning are very low and the money you spend on tickets does not come with a guarantee of a return. Instead, treat the lottery like you would any other entertainment expense, such as movies or snacks. Set a budget ahead of time and be aware of how much you’re willing to spend before you buy tickets.

From the earliest times to the present, lotteries have been a popular way of raising funds for state and private purposes. During the American Revolution, for example, the Continental Congress held several lotteries to fund the army. While the games were often controversial, they served their purpose: “lotteries enable the government to raise large sums of money for public purposes without the imposition of direct taxes on the people.”

The earliest known state-sponsored lotteries were in Europe. They were held by cities and towns in the first half of the 15th century. The word lottery comes from the French loterie and Dutch lotto, which are both from a Frankish/Germanic root (compare Old English hlot, lot), presumably a calque on Middle Dutch lötjerje “action of drawing lots.”

Modern state lotteries began in 1964 with New Hampshire’s pioneering draw, and have proved to be remarkably popular. Since then, they have fueled state spending and become increasingly lucrative for retailers and suppliers. For example, convenience store operators sell a huge amount of tickets and reap the rewards; lottery suppliers make heavy contributions to state political campaigns and earn the loyalty of their employees; teachers — in states where lotteries are earmarked for education — benefit from extra state funding; and legislators have no difficulty selling the idea to voters.

The argument used to justify state lotteries is that players voluntarily spend their own money for the opportunity of a large payoff, and therefore it is more acceptable than imposing a tax. However, there are many other problems with this line of reasoning: Lotteries tend to increase consumption overall; compulsive gamblers do not respond to treatment; and the regressive nature of state lotteries can harm low-income families.

Despite the criticisms, there is no doubt that lotteries have become extremely popular and are here to stay. They are a powerful force in society that lure people with promises of instant wealth, especially in an age of inequality and limited social mobility. They are also a way for the government to promote its own agenda. For example, if the top prize is not claimed in the drawing, it carries over to the next drawing, increasing the jackpot and attracting more ticket-holders. Super-sized jackpots also give the lottery a windfall of free publicity on news sites and TV newscasts, further driving sales.